Are Kenyan banks too big to fail? The digital migration tsunami announced its impending media disruption a whole decade in advance. It is instructive that half a century old giant Kenyan media houses tuned into denial mode.

Are Kenyan banks too big to fail?

Why? That’s what some financial institutions were deemed to be at the height of the credit crunch in America.

The too big to fail theory asserts that certain corporations, particularly financial institutions, are so large and so interconnected. So much so, that their failure would be disastrous to the greater economic system, and they therefore must be supported by government when they face potential failure (Wikipedia).

I will use the term loosely here to refer to institutions that, propelled by complacency, feel they are too big to fail and see no need to change how they sell. With the capping of interest rates, I hope our banks won’t fall into the same ‘too big to fail’ trap as did some media houses with the digital migration. This is the thrust of this post.

Media houses and digital migration tsunami denial

With the digital migration tsunami announcing its impending media disruption a whole decade in advance, it is instructive that major media houses in Kenya, some half a century old, were still caught flat footed.

Even when the tsunami was upon them they were still in denial. “We are too big to fail” must have been their attitude; plus we are a cartel. And so they fought to stop an idea whose time had come. And we all know what they say about that.

They were switched off and over half of Kenya was plunged into TV darkness.

Kenyan banks too big to fail

Last kicks of a dying horse

And what a fight the media houses put on!

Decoder vendors like StarTimes had taken heed of the tsunami warning and ridden the wave of change. As part of the futile fight media houses put up, was to take StarTimes to court for carrying their free-to-air content for, er, free.

Then they took on CAK (Communication Authority of Kenya) to court and then Parliament seeking to have the decision reversed. Then they insisted on carrying their content solely on their set-top boxes, which they would now hurriedly import and distribute first for Kes.500, then, almost immediately, for free; something they should have done a whole decade earlier and led (not followed) the digital migration!

Not even a cartel can stop an idea whos time has come

And when all this failed, they clutched at straws with the final gambit: “Kenyans will protest the ‘TV darkness’ and influence a reversal.” We didn’t. (In fact, one million Kenyans are still switched ‘off’).

Instead, Kenyans discovered they could live without TV. Just as many discovered they could easily walk home when matatus went on strike protesting the installation of safety belts, speed governors and carrying  excess passengers (What a cheek!). Even they thought they were too big to fail.

Meanwhile, media houses were haemorrhaging revenue. With half of Kenya switched off, advertising reach was compromised. Consequently, advertising contracts had to be reviewed and sales suffered. Long story short, they fought a futile battle for about three months and finally went digital, and became another statistic that nothing (not even a cartel) can stop an idea whose time has come.

The price some are paying today for that ‘too big to fail’ attitude is evident with the retrenchments happening and stations being closed.

Media is not comparable to banking; or is it?

Admittedly, in a credit starved, SME propelled, economy, access to credit has far greater ramifications than ‘TV darkness’. Also, Kenyan banks may not have had a globally sustained, decade old warning of the impending interest rate capping, and so thought they are too bog to fail.

But, it’s here now and it doesn’t help that culturally, banks don’t lead, they follow. Innovation is also not in their DNA. And judging by their knee jerk reaction so far, they appear to be going the same way of the media houses.

Will they succeed? Time will tell. Is this an opportunity for Kenyan banks to interrogate if their selling is led, not by a capacity to adapt, but by a ‘too big to fail’ attitude? I think so.

What do you think?

You may also want to read, Will Telkom’s T-Kash survive, let alone thrive?

If you would like to have improved cross functional collaboration towards measurable CX innovative approaches to work, our program MAGNETIC can help. Read more. Alternatively, we propose a free consultation meeting or a call. If in agreement please complete the form below and we will get in touch after receiving your details, none of which will be public. Thank you.

Views – 473

About Author

Related posts

Unlock value from sales tips and techniques as guides not crutches

“It didn’t work when I tried it.” Of course, it didn’t. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t work or it’s bad. It just means it didn’t work for you. Sales people that use sales tips and techniques as crutches unwittingly reveal that they are handicapped. They are handicapped because they want, no, need, to externalise the

Read More

Misaligned seller and company values costs you sales

Aligning personal values and corporate values earns you sales. Misaligned values loses you sales, and may cost the sales person his job. Here are 4 true stories that practically illustrate why you should align salesperson and company values. Case 1: The Preacher We had to part ways. Was he competent? Absolutely! In fact, he was

Read More

Being number one isn’t the challenge; staying there is

Being the top salesman feels much like winning the World Cup. It’s a double-edged sword. One edge cuts the air with jubilation as the world celebrates with you, while the other edge cuts deep with the realization that in the same instant, you are the defending champion. And here’s the thing: being number one is

Read More
Stay ahead in a rapidly changing world with Lend Me Your Ears. It’s Free! Most sales newsletters offer tips on “What” to do. But, rarely do they provide insight on exactly “How” to do it. Without the “How” newsletters are a waste of time.